|
Journal of Perinatology
|
|
|
January/February 2000, Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 6 - 12 |
![]() |
|
Journal Home |
||
| <- Previous | Issue Contents | Next -> |
| Original Article |
|
Moral and Ethical Dilemmas in Critically Ill Newborns: A 20-Year Follow-Up Survey of Massachusetts Pediatricians Correspondence to: E. A. C. is the 1999 recipient of a Kenneth B. Schwartz Fellowship grant in Clinical Pastoral Education. |
| Abstract |
Surveys of Massachusetts pediatricians in the 1970s and 1980s indicated changing attitudes concerning life-saving treatment of newborns, from less to increased intervention. OBJECTIVE: To replicate the 1987 survey, referring to the original 1977 study, regarding opinions about treatment for critically ill neonates. STUDY DESIGN: A long-term follow-up survey of American Academy of Pediatrics Massachusetts membership, maintaining the 1987 instrument, was initiated. RESULTS: A notable demographic shift in respondents from a majority of male practitioners in 1977 (89.6%), to 73% in 1987, to more equal numbers of men and women in 1997 (55% and 45%, respectively; p < 0.001; 1987 vs 1997) was apparent. Pediatricians attitude changes over the 20-year period were relatively modest and were statistically associated with active medical intervention. In 1997, 75% of respondents rejected review committees as mediators, a marked change from 1987. Regardless of healthcare maintenance organization affiliations, 95% indicated that restrictive fiscal policies would not affect decision-making. CONCLUSION: This study indicates stability and consensus in pediatricians attitudes toward active intervention for critically ill neonates compared with 1977 and 1987 surveys and reveals several claims to professional autonomy. |